Ligue 1Ligue 1
Round 32
Paris FC logoParis FC
FT
4 - 0
HT: 20
Stade Brestois 29 logoStade Brestois 29

3 May 2026, 15:15

Stade Jean Bouin, Paris

Marc Bollengier, France

home logoParis FC
13R. Matondo
20W. Geubbels
24H. Traore
35M. Mbow
65I. Kebbal
65W. Geubbels
67R. Matondo
77R. Matondo
77J. Ikone
85H. Traore
89L. Koleosho
Stade Brestois 29away logo
B. Chardonnet26
R. Labeau Lascary60
L. Tousart60
H. Magnetti70
R. Del Castillo71
J. Chotard83

AI Post-Match Analysis

Match Rating
6.9/10
Man of the Match
R. Matondo
Key Moments
113’ R. Matondo’s opening goal, a clinical finish following a swift counter-attack that exposed Brestois’ high defensive line.
220’ W. Geubbels’ second goal, a result of Paris FC’s sustained midfield pressure and effective use of width to stretch the opposition.
367’ R. Matondo’s second goal, showcasing Paris FC’s relentless attacking intent and Brestois’ inability to clear their lines under pressure.
Tactical Insights
Paris FC’s high-pressing strategy disrupted Brestois’ build-up play, leading to turnovers in dangerous areas and creating scoring opportunities.
The team’s emphasis on width and overlapping runs from full-backs generated numerical superiority in attack, overwhelming Brestois’ midfield.
Brestois’ failure to adapt tactically, particularly in defensive transitions, allowed Paris FC to exploit gaps and maintain dominance throughout the match.
Paris FC delivered a dominant performance against Stade Brestois 29, securing a 4-0 victory that reflected their control of key statistical metrics. The match unfolded with Paris FC asserting early dominance, evidenced by their 51% possession and 7 shots on target compared to Brestois’ 1. The first half was pivotal, with Paris FC scoring twice through R. Matondo (13’) and W. Geubbels (20’), capitalizing on Brestois’ defensive vulnerabilities. The second half saw Paris FC maintain their intensity, with Matondo’s second goal (67’) and L. Koleosho’s late strike (89’) extending the lead. Despite three yellow cards, Paris FC’s tactical discipline and pressing efficiency overwhelmed Brestois, who struggled to create meaningful chances. The result underscores Paris FC’s ability to convert possession into goal-scoring opportunities, while Brestois’ lack of cohesion in attack and defense highlighted their tactical shortcomings.